note
· · to read

UM’s boss and M’s boss came to my desk shortly before I clocked out this evening, and said that M’s boss wants to sit and observe what Jaws does when interacting with the db_interface.
I told them that the best way for them to figure that out was to use Jaws themselves, but they shot that one down.
I also told them that Cary would be more than willing to give them information about what’s going on with it, and they said they want to talk to me first, and then maybe we can see about talking to Cary.
I love being treated like some sort of lesser being.
Maybe I should consider it progress, since neither of them stooped down to talk to me.
But then, their tone betrayed it all.
I’m waiting for DSB to get back in touch with me before I drop the L-bomb.
The end result of the latest batch of smoke is that I get to spend tomorrow afternoon letting M’s boss sit there and find out that he can’t see what Jaws is doing, and we’ll be right back at square one.
And here’s the best gem of all.
Apparently their programmers have a remedial knowledge of Jaws and how to use it.
Right.
There is no remedial level.
Either you know how to use it or you don’t, and if you don’t, you can’t make your software accessible.
You have to at least know how it works.
And for M’s boss to sit there and say that their programmers have a remedial knowledge of how to use Jaws tells me they don’t have any knowledge.
I’m hoping I can just evolve to the point where I can live off bullshit, because I’m fed enough of it that, if I could live on it, my grocery bill would be non-existent.
Time to run the maze, yet again.

Originally published at Customerservant.com. You can comment here or there.

note
· · to read

UM came back here to let me know he heard that the suits came back here yesterday to talk to me.
I gave him the run-down, and he said he didn’t care if M’s boss is keen on the idea of using Jaws or not.
He says we should just make him do it anyway.
That’s heartening.
That means the incompetence most likely doesn’t originate with him.
We’ll see where it goes from here.

Originally published at Customerservant.com. You can comment here or there.

note
· · to read

I spent this afternoon sitting with M’s boss, letting him listen to Jaws.
He wanted to prioritize the issues, asking which one is the most important, and should be fixed first.
By the time I left, they were all simpathetic, saying how sorry they are about all this, and how they have forty-five people who know how to use Jaws, and they’re going to get it fixed.
Yesterday it wasn’t that many, and those people had “remedial” knowledge of Jaws.
I was waiting for one of them to start patting me on the head and give me some candy.
I feel so unclean.
There’s no need for either extreme, whether apathetic or simpathetic, just get it fixed.
We’ll see what happens.
I’m not believing anything they say until I see it.

Originally published at Customerservant.com. You can comment here or there.

note
· · to read

I’ve spent the weekend importing posts from LiveJournal, twenty at a time.
I’m thankful I had the backup, but I hope I never have to import like this again.
It’s very tedious work, and I’m not done yet.
I’m not taking it to work though.
I could, but I can’t stand the tedium of the endlesss corporate babble on top of that.
And as far as work is concerned, now UM says we’re in the process of solutioning.
Jesus, that guy must really take me for stupid.
I’d love to put him in his place, but I need this job too much.

note
· · to read

Originally published at customerservant.com. You can comment here or there.

It’s almost 13:00 hours, which means I’m almost through the work day, getting to the halfway point.
Still no progress.
I had John submit a service request to see if the hard drives containing the calls could be mapped, and we’ll see where that goes.
I’ve mainly been reading other blogs this morning, but haven’t found anything else I’d consider posting about.
When you find yourself mining other people’s blogs for content, whether or not it’s on a subconscious level, your life has reached a very low point.
At this point, my dream is to find a good lawyer, sue for whatever I can get, and get out.
Yes, I know, I’m suffering from dilusions at this point.
At least I’m getting paid to be dillusional.

note
· · to read

Originally published at customerservant.com. You can comment here or there.

Today wasn’t as unproductive as it could have been.
I spent most of it trying to get the software that allows call monitoring (specifically, listening to calls) to work with Jaws.
No go.
I’m going to play around tomorrow in the system to see if there’s a way around it.
I also tried using the mass-messaging client, and it is absolutely the most inaccessible piece of software I’ve ever seen, no exaggerations.
This insistence on the part of big corporations to have their very own of everything is ludicrous.
I’m hoping we can raise the productivity level soon.
Most of the software seems to work, and I’d think there would be a way to get around monitoring calls.
I’m also not convinced there’s no way to map the drives the calls are stored on, thanks to outside advice from someone who knows what he’s talking about.
I’m determined to either find an already existing way, or to create a way, that will allow me to be productive.
I refuse to believe that there’s no way a totally blind person can successfully hold another position in this company other than customer service representative.
It defeats any ambition one might have of being upwardly mobile.
I’m not going to suffer a glass ceiling because a bunch of other people who don’t even care in the first place can’t figure out how to think outside the box they’ve fashioned for themselves.
Here’s hoping tomorrow is better.

note
· · to read

Originally published at customerservant.com. You can comment here or there.

I managed to fall asleep at work today, which apparently is a no-no.
UM saw me nodding off, and John came to my desk and said I probably shouldn’t nod off, and said that if I need to stay awake, I can get up and walk around.
There’ll probably be a meeting about it tomorrow or something.
John asked me if Cary had talked to anyone at the client’s center about the problems on his end, and I said yes.
I wonder if that means some information is headed this way, or if John was asking for his own curiosity, or if he was asking because UM said Cary hasn’t said anything.
I’ll ask tomorrow.

note
· · to read

Originally published at customerservant.com. You can comment here or there.

John says there’s some info on the way concerning the DB-Interface, although he doesn’t know what the info is, and we won’t find out until Monday.
I’m wondering if there’s a declaration of accessibility in store.
Maybe, they actually are working on it.
That’s what I’d like to believe.
I’d like a promotion, but I’d prefer a return to some sort of normalcy infinitely more.
I really hope this isn’t just someone blowing more smoke.
This would be worse than all the other times because now someone, though not John, is stating that something’s on the way, and this problem will soon be taken care of.
I’m trying not to be pesimistic, but past experience makes that difficult.
My faith in my employer and the client is almost non-existent.

note
· · to read

Originally published at customerservant.com. You can comment here or there.

Partisanship is finally starting to eat at one of our most cherished technologies, in fact the technology that supports a lot of others: The internet.
The 22-nation Arab League has begun a
similar
system using Arabic suffixes.

“The Internet is no longer the kind of thing where only six guys in
the
world can build it,” says Paul Vixie, 42 years old, a key architect of
the
U.S.-supported Internet. “Now, you can write a couple of checks and
get one
of your own.” To bring attention to the deepening fault lines, Mr.
Vixie
recently joined the German group’s effort.

Alternatives to the Internet have been around since its beginning but
none
gained much traction. Developing nations such as China didn’t have the
infrastructure or know-how to build their own networks and users
generally
didn’t see any benefit from leaving the network that everyone else was
on.

Now that is changing. As people come online in developing nations that
don’t use Roman letters — especially China with its 1.3 billion
people –
alternatives can build critical mass. Unease with the U.S.
government’s
influence over a global resource, and in some cases antipathy toward
the
Bush administration, also lie behind the trend.

“You’ve had some breakaway factions over the years, but they’ve had no
relevance,” says Rodney Joffe, the chairman of UltraDNS, a Brisbane,
Calif., company that provides Internet equipment and services for
companies. “But what’s happened over the past year or so is the
beginning
of the balkanization of the Internet.”

The Internet, developed by U.S. government agencies beginning in the
1960s,
uses a so-called domain-name system, also called the “root,” that
consists
of 264 suffixes. These include .com, .net, .org and country codes such
as
.jp for Japan. The root is coordinated by a private, nonprofit group
in
Marina del Rey, Calif., called the Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names
and Numbers or Icann. This body works under the auspices of the U.S.
Department of Commerce, which set up the organization in 1998.

Having a single root is central to the universality of the Internet
and
critical to its power and appeal. Key servers that are part of the
root
system determine whether the suffix of an Internet domain name is on
the
official list. If so, the message is directed within milliseconds to
the
administrator of each suffix for further routing. In the case of .com,
that
administrator is Verisign Inc.

A single root helps ensure that when people type in a Web address such
as
www.amazon.com, they all end up at the site of the Internet retailer
no
matter where in the world they are or which Internet service provider
they
use. All addresses must use one of the 264 domain names. Any changes
must
be approved by Icann and ultimately by the Commerce Department.
Alternative
roots form the basis for rivals to the Internet.

As the Internet’s role grows around the world, some are uneasy with
the
notion that a U.S.-based body overseen by the U.S. government has sole
power over what domain names are used and who controls each name.
Other
countries such as China also say Icann is too slow in forming domain
names
in non-Roman languages, hindering the development of an Internet
culture in
those countries.

Concern about U.S. oversight increased last summer when the Commerce
Department persuaded Icann to postpone the approval of a new
domain-name
suffix to be used for pornographic Web sites, .xxx. The department
said it
had received letters of complaint from Christian groups. While other
countries also opposed the name, critics cited the incident as
evidence of
Washington’s influence.

The matter of control came to a head last November at a United Nations
summit in Tunis, where the U.S. delegation fought off demands from
more
than 170 countries to give up unilateral oversight of Icann.

More than half of the Internet’s users today are outside the U.S.
Governments increasingly are interested in how the Internet works.
Brazil,
for instance, collects much of its tax revenue online. “The Internet
has
become a critical part of our lives,” says Abdullah Al-Darrab, Saudi
Arabia’s deputy governor for technical affairs. “These policies should
not
be left to a single country or entity.”

U.S. officials counter that the Internet is too valuable to tinker
with or
place under an international body like the U.N. “What’s at risk is the
bureaucratization of the Internet and innovation,” says Michael
Gallagher,
the Department of Commerce official who administers the government’s
tie to
Icann. Mr. Gallagher and other backers of Icann also say that the
countries
loudest in demanding more international input — China, Libya, Syria,
Cuba
– have nondemocratic governments. Allowing these nations to have
influence
over how the Internet works could hinder freedom of speech, they say.

Others argue that a fragmented Internet is a natural result of its
global
growth and shouldn’t be terribly harmful. Governments already control
what
their citizens see on the Internet by blocking some sites, making
surfing a
less-than-universal experience, notes Paul Mockapetris, who invented
the
Internet’s domain-name system in the early 1980s.

Icann’s master database of domain names is preserved in 13
“mirrors” –
servers that automatically copy any changes made to the original
database.
The duplication makes the system robust in cases of attack or failure.
Ten
of the 13 mirrors are in the U.S.; the others are in Amsterdam,
Stockholm
and Tokyo.

Operating the ‘F Root’

A nonprofit organization headed by Mr. Vixie operates one mirror
called the
“F root.” Working without pay or contract from Icann, he runs his
mirror
from the basement of an old telegraph office in a brown stucco
building
with a red, Spanish-tiled roof in Palo Alto, Calif.

Located between a Walgreen’s drugstore and an art gallery, the F root
building looks unimpressive, but it plays a critical role in the flow
of
Internet traffic. Powerful servers inside a locked, metal cage
translate
Internet domain names into a series of numbers, called Internet
protocol
addresses, helping users find Web sites and send and receive email.
Mr.
Vixie’s center handles about 4,000 queries a second from several
continents.

Mr. Vixie, a high-school dropout, was a precocious programmer, helping
while still in his mid-20s write the domain-name software now used on
most
servers. He now runs a company that services the software. He helped
build
the F root in 1994 when he was 30 and helped foil an attack by hackers
in
2002 that hampered all the mirrors except his and one other. Later he
came
up with a way to bolster the system by replicating the function of the
13
mirrors at other servers.

Now Mr. Vixie is turning his attention to what he feels is an even
greater
threat to how the Internet works: fragmentation.

Last June, Mr. Vixie emailed Markus Grundmann, a 35-year-old security
technician in Hannover, Germany. Mr. Vixie was seeking information
about
the Open Root Server Network, or ORSN, which Mr. Grundmann founded.

Mr. Grundmann at first thought the email was fake. He was surprised
that a
pillar of the U.S.-led system would want anything to do with him. He
explained to Mr. Vixie that he set up ORSN in February 2002 because of
his
distrust of the Bush administration and its foreign policy. Mr.
Grundmann
fears that Washington could easily “turn off” the domain name of a
country
it wanted to attack, crippling the Internet communications of that
country’s military and government.

Mr. Vixie says he has no interest in making political statements but
he
agreed last September to work with Mr. Grundmann by operating one of
ORSN’s
13 mirrors. Mr. Vixie has also placed a link to the once-obscure
German
group on his personal Web site.

The moves roiled the Internet community of programmers and techies of
which
he is a prominent member. Vinton Cerf, one of the founders of the
Internet,
says he asked Mr. Vixie on the phone, “What were you thinking?” Says
Mr.
Cerf: “I don’t think it’s helpful to give visibility to a group that
is
fragmenting the Internet.”

Mr. Vixie says he sees the European effort as a check of sorts on the
Icann
system. The U.S.-backed group will be more likely to act in the global
interest if it knows that users have an alternative, he says.

Twelve other computer scientists — mostly in Germany, Austria and
Switzerland — have agreed to help run the new root. Close to 50
Internet
service providers in a half-dozen European countries now use ORSN.
[Making Connections]

For the moment, that is merely a symbolic step. The domain names in
ORSN’s
directory are identical to those in Icann’s. Users of ORSN get routed
in
the same direction as they would have if they were in the Icann system
and
can communicate with the same Web sites. ORSN doesn’t create or sell
its
own domain names. If it did, Mr. Vixie says he would quit immediately.
But
if ORSN disagrees with a move taken by Icann, it could refuse to
follow suit.

“The Internet is a child of the U.S. government,” says Mr. Grundmann.
“But
now the child has grown up and can’t stay at home forever.”

Choosing a Suffix

A company called UnifiedRoot, based in Amsterdam, has taken things a
step
further than ORSN. In late November, the company began offering
customers
the right to register any suffix of their choosing, such as replacing
.com
with the name of their company. The price is $1,000 to register and an
additional $250 each year thereafter.

The company has established its own root and signed up Amsterdam’s
Schiphol
Airport, among other companies, according to Erik Seeboldt,
UnifiedRoot’s
managing director. These companies can use their own brand name as a
domain
name to create addresses such as arrivals.schiphol, he says. Users of
UnifiedRoot can also access all sites using Icann-approved domain
names
such as .com, but Icann users couldn’t go to a .schiphol address, he
says.

“We want to bring freedom and innovation back to the Internet,” says
Mr.
Seeboldt. The Internet service provider Tiscali SpA, which has five
million
subscribers in Europe, and some of Turkey’s largest service providers
use
UnifiedRoot’s naming system.

Some countries with non-Roman alphabets are also taking matters into
their
own hands. China has created three domain names in Chinese
characters –
.zhongguo, .gongsi and .wangluo — and made them available for public
and
commercial use inside China only.

Similarly, Arab countries have in the past 18 months experimented with
country code domain names in Arabic, distinct from the Icann system,
says
Khaled Fattal of Surrey, England. Mr. Fattal is head of Minc.org, a
nonprofit organization dedicated to making the Internet multilingual.

“There is no such thing as a global Internet today,” says Mr. Fattal.
“You
have only an English-language Internet that is deployed
internationally.
How is that empowering millions of Chinese or Arab citizens?”

Icann is responding to the criticism. At its last meeting in December
it
took steps to enhance the role of foreign governments in its decision
making and accelerated the development of non-English domain names.

Paul Twomey, the chief executive officer of Icann, says the divisions
reflect cultural differences between nations that operate under a
strong
government hand and those, including the U.S., that put more trust in
the
private sector. “We are more comfortable with messy outcomes that
work,”
says Mr. Twomey, who is Australian. “But we need to integrate other
values
and languages into the Internet and make sure that it still works as
one
Internet.”

That’s not enough for some. “We would like the process to speed up,”
says
Li Guanghao, the head of international affairs for the China Internet
Network Information Center, in an email interview. The center
allocates
Internet-protocol addresses in China in conjunction with the Icann
system
but is also developing the non-Icann Chinese character suffixes.

Mr. Vixie says he joined ORSN to make clear his view that such efforts
will
continue unless Icann becomes more inclusive. “I realize that this
could
help unleash the hordes of hell,” he says. “But I hope it will make
people
wonder: ‘What if there are more of these?’ “

note
· · to read

No, it’s not some mystical number comparable to forty-two, it’s just my age as of today.
I’ve adopted the custom of saying the particular chapter of Tehillim (Psalms) corresponding to one’s age, so that will change today.
Instead of reciting Tehillim 26, I’ll recite Tehillim 27.
It reads as follows:

1. Of David. The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the stronghold of my life; from whom shall I be frightened?
2. When evildoers draw near to me to devour my flesh, my adversaries and my enemies against me-they stumbled and fell.
3. If a camp encamps against me, my heart shall not fear; if a war should rise up against me, in this I trust.
4. One [thing] I ask of the Lord, that I seek-that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life, to see the pleasantness of the Lord and
to visit His Temple every morning.
5. That He will hide me in His tabernacle on the day of calamity; He will conceal me in the secrecy of His tent; He will lift me up on a rock.
6. And now, my head will be raised over my enemies around me, and I will sacrifice in His tent sacrifices with joyous song; I will sing and chant praise
to the Lord.
7. Hearken, O Lord, to my voice [which] I call out, and be gracious to me and answer me.
8. On Your behalf, my heart says, “Seek My presence.” Your presence, O Lord, I will seek.
9. Do not hide Your presence from me; do not turn Your servant away with anger. You were my help; do not forsake me and do not abandon me, O God of my salvation.
10. For my father and my mother have forsaken me, but the Lord gathers me in.
11. Instruct me, O Lord, in Your way, and lead me in the straight path because of those who lie in wait for me.
12. Do not deliver me to the desires of my adversaries, for false witnesses and speakers of evil have risen against me.
13. Had I not believed in seeing the good of the Lord in the land of the living!
14. Hope for the Lord, be strong and He will give your heart courage, and hope for the Lord.
(The Judaica Press Complete Tanach)

I also plan to give some tzedakah.
And I’ll go to work, and most likely find out that this anxiously-awaited piece of information is just more smoke.
At any rate, I hope this year turns out to be better than the one that just ended.

note
· · to read

That’s right folks.
I haven’t even been here one hour, and they’ve already presented the earth-shaking, momentous piece of information I’ve been waiting for.
And that new piece of information is … A new DB_interface ID.
Yes, that’s going to fix all the problems.
I can feel my blood pressure rising.
John’s supposed to come over here in a few so we can see if I can log in with the new ID.
I don’t know what then.
Probably something equally idiotic.
I’d really like to choke UM right now, and I really don’t care if he manages to find this site and read it.
He’s asked me for the address a couple of times.
If he really wants it, he can have it, but he’d better not come here expecting to be treated like gold.
I’m so sick of all this.
What happened to standards of decency in the work place?
You know, those rules that prevent you from outright lying to people just because you can, and giving people the run-around?
I’m sure I’ve probably broken a few of the laws of lashon hara, and as soon as I figure out what those laws are, I’ll repent.
But right now I’m really angry about all this.
All I want to do is come in here and work.
You’d think the employer would want that too.
But apparently they just want to take the path of least resistance, because that’s somehow easier.
This is very discouraging.

note
· · to read

I got to work this morning, and John called me down to his desk, and gave me the birthday card he forgot to bring yesterday.
I opened the card, and saw that it’s the same one my Grandma sent me.
Now, since the variety of Braille cards is quite limited, this sort of thing is bound to happen.
It’s just funny that it came from John and Rich, so I’ve been teasing John about happy times and hugs day, which is what we decided to jokingly label today.
He threatened to bring UM into it, then reneged because he wasn’t sure he could bring himself to do it.
Hurray for sick, twisted humor.

note
· · to read

While still reading through the latest posting of Haveil Havalim, I found this little gem.
I’m not sure if I should link it or not.
Do I provide humor for you all, while giving this idiot more attention, or do we just try to sweep him under the rug and hope he’ll give up.
Let’s go with the latter.
Either way, here’s his mission statement:

Absolute Celibacy
This blog promotes the true view of Judaism, that according to the Holy Torah, all sexual activity is absolutely forbidden.
All sex between all combinations of males and females (one of each, or two of one) absolutely forbidden (see Leviticus 18:22, which forbids sex either with
a “zochor” or with an “isha”, a male or a female). Furthermore, auto-sexual activity is even forbidden. First of all, anyone who commits masturbatory auto-sexuality
is violating Leviticus 18:22, because that person is himself or herself already a “zochor” or “isha”. But second of all, there’s a specific prohibition
against masturbation– it is for this reason that God struck Onan dead (see Genesis, chapter 38)!
I am starting this website to raise the important awareness of this topic.
Most Rabbis (emissaries of Satan, some of who are no more than Christians with beards) will tell you that marital sex is permitted, or even encouraged,
in Judaism. I have nothing but rage against such sinners!

For the record, Leviticus 18:22 states: “You shall not lie down with a male, as with a woman: this is an abomination.” (Judaica Press Complete Tanach)