Amanda CAARSON

It’s not about policy or convictions; it’s about who will kiss the ring, praise him, and ensure he can do whatever he wants. https://t.co/qBf0907m9r

— Paris Marx (@parismarx) May 30, 2022

The fact is there are many protective measures that make a ton of sense, enjoy overwhelming support among the American people, and that don’t disarm a single law-abiding citizen.

Those who ignore this simple fact & scare their supporters with lies aren’t serious about helping.

— Heath Mayo (@HeathMayo) May 30, 2022

While you’re at it, please also name one law-abiding American that incremental training and certification requirements for the purchase of an AR-15 would disarm.

Also, name one law-abiding American that would be disarmed by limiting access to 20+-round magazines.

— Heath Mayo (@HeathMayo) May 30, 2022

Hey, @TedCruz: You’ve said that the objective of every person clamoring for better gun policy is to “disarm law-abiding Americans.”

Please name one law-abiding American a universal background check would disarm. Thanks.

— Heath Mayo (@HeathMayo) May 30, 2022

We all have to make split second decisions. Cops shouldn’t get a pass for making bad and cowardly ones. https://t.co/rWMG5D74Hn

— Jay Marshall Wolman (@wolmanj) May 29, 2022

The circular logic of we need guns in case the government tries to take away our guns gets me every time. It’s never if the government is going to take away half the population’s bodily autonomy. It’s always just the guns.

— Schooley (@Rschooley) May 29, 2022

I mean you can also ask people to remember the men and women that have died for this country. But that would require you not being an asshole. https://t.co/J6YAUjJAft

— Ruben Gallego (@RubenGallego) May 29, 2022