I completely understand why some people might want to use something like 11labs to preserve the voice of a deceased loved-one for their own use, but did anyone check with Tunehead's family, for instance, to find out if they're OK with his being reduced to a voice print for mass consumption? That struck me as disturbing in a way I'm having trouble defining and I knew him for years. And it demonstrates why we need to be having robust ethics discussions around this kind of technology.
Inside the mind of the American voter.
Welp the Twitter app is definitely going to start heading down the shitter because the head of product engineering for the app has left the building. https://twitterisgoinggreat.com/#more-key-senior-engineers-leave-twitter
The vote was further proof that the question isn’t where to draw the line between criticism of Israel and antisemitism. It’s all about politics.
The good doctor talks Genesis, Exodus, genocide, WEF, civics, and the theory of everything.
It's really weird that when "free speech absolutists" reach for an example of risky speech, it's never speaking truth to power but rather finding ways to continue to punch down on marginalized communities without consequence.
The central flaw of the social conservative project is confusing one's own lifestyle preferences for universal truths about how everyone ought to live.