People were getting justifiably pissed off about what felt like a complete “whim” decision to defederate mastodon.social.

Not realizing that no one was announcing defederation, but a Silence. (Also known as a “Limit”)

Silence is infinitely less destructive, and doesn’t break follow relationships, and still allows you to follow people on the other server, it just puts the server in a more ‘restricted’ mode so that randos from that server don’t have the same privileges (to your eyeballs) that non-silenced servers do.

Suspend is what you do when you’re done with that server. When you’ve given up, and when you’ve informed users on your server that you’re defederating a server that has existing follow relationships you’re about to break.

Most of the time that is not a decision that is made lightly especially when there are already existing follow relationships between the two servers.

(This is another reason mastodon.social has little to fear from defederation, but I digress.)

—@oliphant

For those #mastoadmin who have to clean up the mess, this query helped a bunch – obviously replace Infosec.exchange with your domain. You can select all accounts and suspend at once, then jump to the end and you’ll see two accounts that are inadvertently swept up – just manually unsuspend those.

https://infosec.exchange/admin/accounts?origin=remote&status=&role_ids=&order=recent&username=&by_domain=mastodon.social&display_name=doge&email=&ip=

—@jerry

The size of mastodon.social is breaking the moderation story of the #Fediverse.

Moderation on fedi relies on:

1. instance admins and moderators being able to manage bad actors on their own instance;

2. instance admins being able to defederate from insufficiently moderated instances.

Mastodon.social’s size and the speed new accounts are set up there means that 1. is unworkable. The size of m.s. and the clout of some of its users means 2. is a hard decision.

—@rysiek

ah yes, well it is that i remember the Good Samaritan story. after the Levite and the Pharisee left the injured man on the road, the Samaritan came and put him in a chokehold for nine minutes and killed him.

Jesus the Nazarene tells this story in the book of Money, as a parable to illustrate the virtues of strength and supremacy.

—@dgold

I know I’m always on about this when cops or other folks kill some agitated person, but for real y’all — we in the ER see people who are angry, threatening, violent, and scary EVERY shift, and we kill zero of them. We don’t shoot them. We don’t choke them to death. Most of the time we talk them down and that’s it. Sometimes we restrain them, but we do it safely.

I have very scary people blow up at me. Often I literally pull up a chair and we talk it out. Please, we can be better.

—@mcnado

timberwraith (@timberwraith@mastodon.social) (Mastodon)
"They have you fighting a culture war in order to stop you from fighting a class war." Those with power are exploiting bigotry and a widespread embrace of (violent) social hierarchy that is already present in the masses in order to protect a violent class hierarchy which favors their own interests. The hatred and violence that you, the average person, thinks is justifiable against your favorite hated minority also makes your own oppression and suffering possible.

interesting that after a decade or so of mainstream consensus that anonymity is bad and antisocial and everyone should use real names on platforms that rewarded both outrageousness and outrage, we hit a point in about 2014(??) at which people started just continuously saying previously unspeakable things under their official headshots

—@kissane

I’m gonna come out and say it again — if you feel the need to refuse standard of care medical treatment for religious or moral reasons, you don’t belong in medicine. Just fuck off and find a career where vulnerable people relying on you don’t suffer because of your selfishness. I treat nazis. I treat pedophiles. I treat people of all stripes. I’ve treated drunk drivers after I took the radio call to pronounce time of death for their victims.

We. Don’t. Refuse. Care.

—@mcnado

Social Security is not insurance. It’s not a savings account you paid into and now can withdraw from. Social Security doesn’t work like that. The Republicans would desperately like you to believe it does because then you won’t realize that Social Security is socialism for old people. They want you to believe that you have to have worked hard to “deserve” Social Security, or that you might be able to get more money from it if you invested instead of giving your money to the government.

Social Security distributes money to people who are eligible for it. They could easily make us all eligible for it. That’s what they don’t want you to know. It’s funded by the government, not by people paying into it. It’s not going to “run out” unless the government cuts funding for it. It’s a line item in the budget. That line item could be increased easily by increasing revenue through higher taxes on the rich, or through cutting spending for the military. Social Security is a basic income, which could be made universal if there was the political will to do so.

Thus endeth the sermon.

—@intransitivelie

Y’all, DeSantis labeling Mr. Perry a good samaritan is peak 2023 Republicanism.

Using the parable of the good Samaritan, Mr. Neely would have been offered help such as food and shelter by Mr. Perry, not choked to death for 15 minutes.

Good Samaritans HELP people. The “good guy with a gun” (or chokehold?) is not a good samaritan, because they aren’t helping someone in distress. They may be some other cultural hero archetype, but they sure as fuck aren’t samaritans.

—@mcnado

#WebDev people, please don’t use #accessibility overlays when making your site. They create more problems than they solve for people with disabilities and they’re not enough for #WCAG compliance. Accessibility can’t and shouldn’t be automated, you should actually care, solve it at the source and listen. Here’s why: https://overlayfactsheet.com/#what-is-a-web-accessibility-overlay

—@gracjan