In reply to @matt.

@matt @miki @bryansmart @cordova5029 @simon I'd have to double check specific companies, but I think in most cases it's been more like all the accessibility contractors were cut while in-house teams stayed. That's completely sidestepping the bit about no one actually listening t o their in-house accessibility teams but that's a road I don't want to go down because frankly I'll just go on for hours lol.

In reply to @bryansmart.

@bryansmart @matt @cordova5029 @simon This is true, but now you have a 2+generation situation that you'd have to undo before they could become a drop-in. This would maybe be fixable if we were 10 years in, but 50+60 years is an incredible gap to bridge and I'm not sure anyone with enough resources has the willpower for that. To say nothing of what you do for the multidisability kids you'd necessarily have to displace.

In reply to @matt.

@matt @bryansmart @cordova5029 @simon I expect that, when it comes to math and science, probably not that much more accessible. Unless something revolutionary has happened since the last time I took a college math course in 2010 or so. And yes, I'm aware of attempts to fix the situation from the assistive tech/other technologies end. This is why I'm not a fan of the bring your own accessibility strategy, however much I may understand +