In reply to @scottrut.

@scottrut Amazon owns it and its book database, which is why, even though things like its recommendations absolutely suck, and you don't have control of your data, and the archive they'll give you is quite limited, any alternative like Bookwyrm suffers from the problem of people being easily able to find and track books and get recommendations for new things to read.

In reply to @weirdwriter.

@weirdwriter @AppleVis I totally get needing to pick a single editor, and in the case of sighted and blind content managers working together it's almost always going to have to be the block editor. But AV's declaration that it's accessible at this point is one hell of a reach. And we're still talking about simple sites. I'm just going to leave more complicated sites than basic text/image alone for now because spoiler alert: the block editor will +

In reply to @AppleVis.

@AppleVis I'm not sure how you can claim something is accessible when you need to use an offline tool to compose your content. Also, the assertion that Gutenberg is primarily a layout editor is incorrect. It deliberately erases the line between presentation and layout and attempts to be Microsoft Word for WordPress, which it will never succeed at.