Status

If Freedom Scientific had spent less time whining …

Written by

in

If Freedom Scientific had spent less time whining and throwing Mozilla developers under the bus, and more time following NV Access’s example of rolling up sleeves and playing ball, Jaws users wouldn’t still be required to use Firefox ESR.

Comments

65 responses to “If Freedom Scientific had spent less time whining …”

  1. Harlow. ?

    I’m waiting for the states to stop paying for Jaws, so they can finally either restructure or go under. #JustSayin

  2. Justin Romack

    FS is dying a slow death… I say good riddance.

  3. ((( Amanda )))

    Not going to happen. There are too many employers who don’t allow open source software on their systems. Plus, there’s still the feds who pay for and use it.

  4. Amanda Rush

    Yeah I’m not going to miss them either. Have feet, will dance on grave.

  5. ((( Amanda )))

    Don’t get me wrong. When they go under, I will be the first to dance on their grave and hand out smors cooked over the healthy forest fire. But states won’t quit buying.

  6. Ruthie Rayne

    I know, but it’s nice to dream.

  7. ((( Amanda )))

    They’ll go down *in spite of* state money. They’ll probably end up being the Blackberry of screen readers.

  8. Ruthie Rayne

    And in reality, that would be more satisfying.

  9. Tyler Kavanaugh

    What makes you think they’ll go down in spite of state money? Is the consolidation in the industry perhaps what makes you think this will happen?

  10. Ruthie Rayne

    For me, it’s in part that in their pride they got rid of the better screen reader. And also where this thread started, that them not working with companies like Mozilla like NVDA is has caused the need for their users to use Firefox ESR.

  11. Mohamed Al-Hajamy??

    If you’re going to burn them, at least try to take the video driver as a souvenir 😛

  12. Chad Blanco

    Do you know what will eventually make them go down? Besides people switching to NVDA?

  13. ((( Amanda )))

    Microsoft closing security holes, and built-in screen readers.

  14. Chad Blanco

    Yeah, that’ll do it. Narrator is catching up fast to the third party ones.

  15. Amy Billman

    It’s run by ego-ridden twat males. If NVDA worked with my transcription software I’d probably not ever renew my SMA ever ever ever. As it is, I hate giving it to them every year. If I could afford both I’d turn it around and donate it to them; though I confess that if NVDA ever charged, I’d view it as money better spent than giving it to Freedom. Meanwhile, the new firefox is supposed to work with 2018, and it’s still incredibly slow making it necessary to run ESR. It’s stupid!

  16. Tim Böttcher

    And if they’d payed attention, Java’s Accessibility API would be supported. *sighs* 2,000 € and it doesn’t support the accessibility API of one of the most popular cross platform programming languages.

  17. Amanda Rush

    I hear you on needing to use Jaws for work. A lot of people are in that position. Also I hear you on Freedom Scientific being run by egotistical little twots.

  18. ((( Amanda )))

    Yeah. That’s tragic, to say the least.

  19. Tim Böttcher

    Then again: Apple: Swift isn’t even (comfortably) usable on anything else but OS x. Python? The accessibility API package is only available on Linux. I feel like puking nonstop.#AccessibilityForDevelopers is really, REALLY poor, from my point of view.

  20. Tim Böttcher

    Sometimes I wonder what I could’ve acomplished since 2016 if one of these languages would’ve been a bit more accessible for me as developer…
    But when I’m done with my final graduation I can finally start to use NVDA. Hopefully at least Java will work then.

  21. Tim Böttcher

    Also will soon have a mac course to start develop apps in xcode. And I’ll try to get Linux, Orca, BRLTTY. Just a lot to learn, but I can make it. 😉

  22. Amy Billman

    I just try to tell myself that it’s advantageous because I get a deduction on my taxes. 😀

  23. Amanda Rush

    I use Jaws only when absolutely necessary. And by “Absolutely necessary”, I mean I’d better not be able to use at least object nav to get around and manipulate the screen. Because if I can use object nav, I’m not using Jaws.

  24. Chris Meredith

    Someone needs to add native Remote Desktop and Citrix support to NVDA. NVDA Remote can’t be used through my employer’s proxy, I’m betting.

  25. Woodstock

    How about, if they stopped throwing the NVDA community as a collective under the bus and take their lead. Accessibility is a right, not a privilege. A sighted person can walk up to a computer and use it. Why should we have to shell out thousands to use our computers?

  26. ((( Amanda )))

    We don’t want Freedom Scientific leading the NVDA community. They are, as expected, pretty anti-open-source.

  27. Woodstock

    That’s my point. I’m saying that if FS wants to stay in the market, they’re going to have to change there attitudes… quick!

  28. Aaron Howell

    NVDA still can’t support SecureCRT, Jamie did add limited support for me once long ago, but it was heavily dependent on a particular version of a dll they were using which changed with every major release of SecureCRT, so it broke in fairly short order. Its essential to my job, so, no NVDA for me, Plus, I hate Object Nav with a passion. I’m hesitant to entirely blame FS either, Mozilla do have a history of “my way or the highway” when it comes to accessibility support, for a long time Firefox wasn’t accessible with VoiceOver on the Mac because Mozilla wanted Apple to adopt their accessibility methodology instead of playing nice with Apple’s already well established guidelines. Blame exists on both sides.

  29. smoke-j BSG

    that presumes a screen reader user needs to use Firefox though. For example, I’m not required to use FF for anything.

  30. Jack Swagger

    BEcause there’s that thing they call Google Chrome. Firefox users know what works and what doesn’t, though. On a business machine that could be slightly problematic if you have only ff and jaws on the machine, and it’s locked down tightly.

  31. ((( Amanda )))

    These changes came to Edge, they’re now in Firefox, and they’re coming to Chrome. So FS is going to have to be willing to come to the table instead of spending time grandstanding when they have no way of winning.

  32. ((( Amanda )))

    They can’t expect for progress to be haulted so they can maintain a legacy code base.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.